Recalls: what did we learn from Wisconsin?

Obviously, if you are a supporter of Scott Walker, his allies, and the policy positions they represent, you have to be delighted with the outcome of the Wisconsin Recall elections last night. GOP pundits are characterizing this as a victory for the cuts in taxes and the resulting cuts in social services, plus a blow against the public employee unions that represent one of the few means Democrats have of raising large sums of cash to compete with the GOP.

Well, not so fast. The pundits might be right, but how does one explain that the same electorate that retained Walker and his allies still supports Obama over Romney by nine percentage points? My hypothesis is that many people still hold to a very pure view of the reason for recalls to exist, which is not to remove politically unpopular people from office, but to remove people who are morally or mentally unfit to continue serving. Here are two contrasting historical examples.

Just over twenty years ago, my state senator was convicted on a sexual molestation charge involving his stepdaughter. He was successfully recalled from office. This is a clear-cut example of the intention of the recall.

More recently, Governor Grey Davis of California was successfully recalled because of how he chose to balance California’s budget, despite the fact that he has never been accused of malfeasance of any kind. This is absolutely not what the recall was intended for.

I’m no Scott Walker fan but, looking at last night, I think he falls much closer to Grey Davis than to the state senator. True, there is a criminal investigation in the works against Walker and it is true that he ran a campaign as a populist who has proven to be anything but. However, politicians who pull a bait-and-switch to get elected are too numerous to list, and any malfeasance on Walker’s part is, at most, in the accusatory stage. My hope is that what we learn from Wisconsin, in the long run, is that shady, egomaniacal billionaires and fatuous political operatives will do anything to win an election and that there are still enough morally-outraged Americans who will be mobilized by this to stop our beloved country from being turned into a plutocracy.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Recalls: what did we learn from Wisconsin?

  1. Willie Krash says:

    Publius we may be on the opposite sides of the fence on this one. With respect to my (ours?) state the elected have few issues that state law addresses with respect to accountability. So few in fact it suggest if you are unhappy recall is the method. Tho’ politicians can’t read tea leaves as in the case of Grey Davis, political death is part of political life. Russ Feingold? Oh Wisconsin.
    I would argue with the Citizens United ruling, the money and given that the media is controlled by perhaps six conglomerates things do not bode well.
    I do under your point however and ours views are frustrating.

    • Willie Krash says:

      Make that I understand your point.
      It is interesting to me that we can agree on much and in this case I understand and appreciate your view. We are not far apart at all and if this were a policy issue we could move the ball forward. You see at one time I was on the other side of the fence with respect to this issue. I too was threatened with a recall.

  2. publius17 says:

    Oh, yeah. I have a really easy time imagining YOU being guilty of unethical or immoral behavior (he says sarcastically). Knowing the recalls in our area that have been run against local politicians, my guess is that you just happened to piss off the wrong person, and that person got his lynch mob-minded buddies together to go after you.

    • Willie Krash says:

      Touche’
      To your point.
      It would be a good conversation to have in as much as I tried an experiment “not to kick the can down the road.”
      If is what we are told the voter wishes as long as it is not their dime otherwise kick it down the road.
      Btw, Thank you for your assessment. You are correct..

      Speaking of assessment after careful thinking I retract my assessment on recall and agree with your assessment. I had to mull it over.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s